We recently received this query from an AIW team.
Our response:
This is a great question and gets at the heart of differentiation, grouping of students, and tracking. Tasks should score high a reasonable amount of the time regardless of kids' ability levels. Ideally, we should have similar HIGH standards and expectations for all learners, with modifications, adaptations, scaffolding, etc to help students who are struggling readers or who need other kinds of assistance. This sounds like a great, high scoring AIW task, and it should not be scored differently based on the students. Its wording, the steps to complete it, a rubric all may need tweaking for different groups and the Algebra A students would likely need help with the text (re-written, read out loud, etc) and maybe more step by step coaching to complete the task, but we'd hate to see them get dumbed-down tasks because of their current skill levels (which are not static).
A helpful resource on maintaining high expectations for all learners and what should and should not be differentiated—Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction & understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.